User talk:Cdrras - Revision history

>Craig.Davison: /* 25 June 2013 Update */ new section

2013-07-14T10:34:05Z

25 June 2013 Update: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:34, 14 July 2013
Line 30:		Line 30:
	:Great job! I have been following the progress. I apologize for now contributing much the last few days. I've been pretty busy and have had about zero time to do much on here. I'm hoping that will change here in the next few days. In the meantime and until then, I should be able to find a few minutes here and there and do some minor edits. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 18:11, 17 March 2013 (MDT)		:Great job! I have been following the progress. I apologize for now contributing much the last few days. I've been pretty busy and have had about zero time to do much on here. I'm hoping that will change here in the next few days. In the meantime and until then, I should be able to find a few minutes here and there and do some minor edits. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 18:11, 17 March 2013 (MDT)
	::Not a problem. There will be times I don't contribute, either, and I expect to eventually be distracted by something that comes along later. --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 20:53, 17 March 2013 (MDT)		::Not a problem. There will be times I don't contribute, either, and I expect to eventually be distracted by something that comes along later. --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 20:53, 17 March 2013 (MDT)

			== 25 June 2013 Update ==

			Metalwork Bench needs to be added to crafting surfaces.--[[User:Craig.Davison\|Craig.Davison]] ([[User talk:Craig.Davison\|talk]]) 04:34, 14 July 2013 (MDT)

>McClaw: /* A goal reached! */

2013-03-18T02:53:36Z

A goal reached!

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:53, 17 March 2013
Line 29:		Line 29:
	Note the Main Page -- there should be no red (undefined) links. All pages there now have content! --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 15:11, 17 March 2013 (MDT)		Note the Main Page -- there should be no red (undefined) links. All pages there now have content! --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 15:11, 17 March 2013 (MDT)
	:Great job! I have been following the progress. I apologize for now contributing much the last few days. I've been pretty busy and have had about zero time to do much on here. I'm hoping that will change here in the next few days. In the meantime and until then, I should be able to find a few minutes here and there and do some minor edits. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 18:11, 17 March 2013 (MDT)		:Great job! I have been following the progress. I apologize for now contributing much the last few days. I've been pretty busy and have had about zero time to do much on here. I'm hoping that will change here in the next few days. In the meantime and until then, I should be able to find a few minutes here and there and do some minor edits. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 18:11, 17 March 2013 (MDT)
			::Not a problem. There will be times I don't contribute, either, and I expect to eventually be distracted by something that comes along later. --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 20:53, 17 March 2013 (MDT)

>Cdrras: /* A goal reached! */

2013-03-18T00:11:27Z

A goal reached!

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, 17 March 2013
Line 28:		Line 28:

	Note the Main Page -- there should be no red (undefined) links. All pages there now have content! --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 15:11, 17 March 2013 (MDT)		Note the Main Page -- there should be no red (undefined) links. All pages there now have content! --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 15:11, 17 March 2013 (MDT)
			:Great job! I have been following the progress. I apologize for now contributing much the last few days. I've been pretty busy and have had about zero time to do much on here. I'm hoping that will change here in the next few days. In the meantime and until then, I should be able to find a few minutes here and there and do some minor edits. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 18:11, 17 March 2013 (MDT)

>McClaw: /* A goal reached! */ new section

2013-03-17T21:11:46Z

A goal reached!: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:11, 17 March 2013
Line 24:		Line 24:
	No "Tinfoil Hat" under "Clothing" for the Main Page? --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 21:11, 11 March 2013 (MDT)		No "Tinfoil Hat" under "Clothing" for the Main Page? --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 21:11, 11 March 2013 (MDT)
	:Just haven't added it yet! [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 06:26, 12 March 2013 (MDT)		:Just haven't added it yet! [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 06:26, 12 March 2013 (MDT)

			== A goal reached! ==

			Note the Main Page -- there should be no red (undefined) links. All pages there now have content! --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 15:11, 17 March 2013 (MDT)

>Cdrras: /* 11 March 2013 update */

2013-03-12T12:26:22Z

11 March 2013 update

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:26, 12 March 2013
Line 23:		Line 23:

	No "Tinfoil Hat" under "Clothing" for the Main Page? --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 21:11, 11 March 2013 (MDT)		No "Tinfoil Hat" under "Clothing" for the Main Page? --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 21:11, 11 March 2013 (MDT)
			:Just haven't added it yet! [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 06:26, 12 March 2013 (MDT)

>McClaw: /* 11 March 2013 update */ new section

2013-03-12T03:11:35Z

11 March 2013 update: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:11, 11 March 2013
Line 19:		Line 19:
	::Mine have been plain old screen captures. That lets me get multiples and a little copy/paste/save produces what I want. It also lets me fiddle with the selection if I miss something. But the icons end up just 40x40, and the blocks are 80x80 or a little less. (Hm, I wonder if I can paint a background wall and place some items against it for contrast...) --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 09:58, 26 February 2013 (MST)		::Mine have been plain old screen captures. That lets me get multiples and a little copy/paste/save produces what I want. It also lets me fiddle with the selection if I miss something. But the icons end up just 40x40, and the blocks are 80x80 or a little less. (Hm, I wonder if I can paint a background wall and place some items against it for contrast...) --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 09:58, 26 February 2013 (MST)
	::: If they are that size, that should be fine. I don't think we will ever go higher than that for the icons or blocks. I think I chose the 75x75 for the icons because when I cropped the very first one, it came out about that size. So it stuck. Of course the 75x75 doesn't quite fit properly and look good with the templates so that is why it gets resized down to 40px. Just remember, you can make the images any size bigger than what we have been using. You can always size down and not lose resolution. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 10:08, 26 February 2013 (MST)		::: If they are that size, that should be fine. I don't think we will ever go higher than that for the icons or blocks. I think I chose the 75x75 for the icons because when I cropped the very first one, it came out about that size. So it stuck. Of course the 75x75 doesn't quite fit properly and look good with the templates so that is why it gets resized down to 40px. Just remember, you can make the images any size bigger than what we have been using. You can always size down and not lose resolution. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 10:08, 26 February 2013 (MST)

			== 11 March 2013 update ==

			No "Tinfoil Hat" under "Clothing" for the Main Page? --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 21:11, 11 March 2013 (MDT)

>Cdrras: /* Icons */

2013-02-26T17:08:12Z

Icons

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:08, 26 February 2013
Line 18:		Line 18:
	:I have noticed that it really all depends on which slot they are in in the inventory. I've been using the technique I highlighted on the Main Page Talk on capturing images. It is the quickest and easiest way and I don't have to fire up Photoshop. With the icon images, they have been 75x75 which is fairly small. They eventually get sized down on some of the tables to 25px. On the infoboxes they get resized to 40px. The problem I run into on occasion is when I try to align the image up, sometimes I get the shadow and sometimes I don't. When I don't get the shadow, it is because if I move the image any more to one side, I end up getting dead space or capture part of the slot next to it. The other side will have a huge shadow mark which doesn't look too good. Either way, when they are that small, you don't notice it one bit. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 09:25, 26 February 2013 (MST)		:I have noticed that it really all depends on which slot they are in in the inventory. I've been using the technique I highlighted on the Main Page Talk on capturing images. It is the quickest and easiest way and I don't have to fire up Photoshop. With the icon images, they have been 75x75 which is fairly small. They eventually get sized down on some of the tables to 25px. On the infoboxes they get resized to 40px. The problem I run into on occasion is when I try to align the image up, sometimes I get the shadow and sometimes I don't. When I don't get the shadow, it is because if I move the image any more to one side, I end up getting dead space or capture part of the slot next to it. The other side will have a huge shadow mark which doesn't look too good. Either way, when they are that small, you don't notice it one bit. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 09:25, 26 February 2013 (MST)
	::Mine have been plain old screen captures. That lets me get multiples and a little copy/paste/save produces what I want. It also lets me fiddle with the selection if I miss something. But the icons end up just 40x40, and the blocks are 80x80 or a little less. (Hm, I wonder if I can paint a background wall and place some items against it for contrast...) --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 09:58, 26 February 2013 (MST)		::Mine have been plain old screen captures. That lets me get multiples and a little copy/paste/save produces what I want. It also lets me fiddle with the selection if I miss something. But the icons end up just 40x40, and the blocks are 80x80 or a little less. (Hm, I wonder if I can paint a background wall and place some items against it for contrast...) --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 09:58, 26 February 2013 (MST)
			::: If they are that size, that should be fine. I don't think we will ever go higher than that for the icons or blocks. I think I chose the 75x75 for the icons because when I cropped the very first one, it came out about that size. So it stuck. Of course the 75x75 doesn't quite fit properly and look good with the templates so that is why it gets resized down to 40px. Just remember, you can make the images any size bigger than what we have been using. You can always size down and not lose resolution. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 10:08, 26 February 2013 (MST)

>McClaw at 16:58, 26 February 2013

2013-02-26T16:58:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:58, 26 February 2013
Line 17:		Line 17:
	I've noticed a lot of your most recent icon images are missing the darker "shadow" on the right and bottom edges. Is this deliberate or were they just not there? --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 09:17, 26 February 2013 (MST)		I've noticed a lot of your most recent icon images are missing the darker "shadow" on the right and bottom edges. Is this deliberate or were they just not there? --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 09:17, 26 February 2013 (MST)
	:I have noticed that it really all depends on which slot they are in in the inventory. I've been using the technique I highlighted on the Main Page Talk on capturing images. It is the quickest and easiest way and I don't have to fire up Photoshop. With the icon images, they have been 75x75 which is fairly small. They eventually get sized down on some of the tables to 25px. On the infoboxes they get resized to 40px. The problem I run into on occasion is when I try to align the image up, sometimes I get the shadow and sometimes I don't. When I don't get the shadow, it is because if I move the image any more to one side, I end up getting dead space or capture part of the slot next to it. The other side will have a huge shadow mark which doesn't look too good. Either way, when they are that small, you don't notice it one bit. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 09:25, 26 February 2013 (MST)		:I have noticed that it really all depends on which slot they are in in the inventory. I've been using the technique I highlighted on the Main Page Talk on capturing images. It is the quickest and easiest way and I don't have to fire up Photoshop. With the icon images, they have been 75x75 which is fairly small. They eventually get sized down on some of the tables to 25px. On the infoboxes they get resized to 40px. The problem I run into on occasion is when I try to align the image up, sometimes I get the shadow and sometimes I don't. When I don't get the shadow, it is because if I move the image any more to one side, I end up getting dead space or capture part of the slot next to it. The other side will have a huge shadow mark which doesn't look too good. Either way, when they are that small, you don't notice it one bit. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 09:25, 26 February 2013 (MST)
			::Mine have been plain old screen captures. That lets me get multiples and a little copy/paste/save produces what I want. It also lets me fiddle with the selection if I miss something. But the icons end up just 40x40, and the blocks are 80x80 or a little less. (Hm, I wonder if I can paint a background wall and place some items against it for contrast...) --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 09:58, 26 February 2013 (MST)

>Cdrras: /* Icons */

2013-02-26T16:25:27Z

Icons

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:25, 26 February 2013
Line 16:		Line 16:

	I've noticed a lot of your most recent icon images are missing the darker "shadow" on the right and bottom edges. Is this deliberate or were they just not there? --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 09:17, 26 February 2013 (MST)		I've noticed a lot of your most recent icon images are missing the darker "shadow" on the right and bottom edges. Is this deliberate or were they just not there? --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 09:17, 26 February 2013 (MST)
			:I have noticed that it really all depends on which slot they are in in the inventory. I've been using the technique I highlighted on the Main Page Talk on capturing images. It is the quickest and easiest way and I don't have to fire up Photoshop. With the icon images, they have been 75x75 which is fairly small. They eventually get sized down on some of the tables to 25px. On the infoboxes they get resized to 40px. The problem I run into on occasion is when I try to align the image up, sometimes I get the shadow and sometimes I don't. When I don't get the shadow, it is because if I move the image any more to one side, I end up getting dead space or capture part of the slot next to it. The other side will have a huge shadow mark which doesn't look too good. Either way, when they are that small, you don't notice it one bit. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 09:25, 26 February 2013 (MST)

>McClaw: /* Icons */ new section

2013-02-26T16:17:02Z

Icons: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:17, 26 February 2013
Line 12:		Line 12:
	What would you think of renaming "Environment" and "Health" to "X Bar" and redirecting from their original pages? This would then be the standard for "Hunger" and "Breath," too. My thought is that it clarifies that the page refers to an attribute, not a more general game feature. --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 09:29, 20 February 2013 (MST)		What would you think of renaming "Environment" and "Health" to "X Bar" and redirecting from their original pages? This would then be the standard for "Hunger" and "Breath," too. My thought is that it clarifies that the page refers to an attribute, not a more general game feature. --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 09:29, 20 February 2013 (MST)
	:You are right! Good point! On the Main Page the attributes are listed under "Character Attributes" so it is easily understood. However, if someone goes to the page, it does not clarify that it is an attribute except in the description. The title should be more descriptive. If you go to Environment, you don't know whether it is the attribute or referring to the actual environment. With that said, we should have pages that say "X Bar" and have the originals redirect to them. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 09:59, 20 February 2013 (MST)		:You are right! Good point! On the Main Page the attributes are listed under "Character Attributes" so it is easily understood. However, if someone goes to the page, it does not clarify that it is an attribute except in the description. The title should be more descriptive. If you go to Environment, you don't know whether it is the attribute or referring to the actual environment. With that said, we should have pages that say "X Bar" and have the originals redirect to them. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 09:59, 20 February 2013 (MST)

			== Icons ==

			I've noticed a lot of your most recent icon images are missing the darker "shadow" on the right and bottom edges. Is this deliberate or were they just not there? --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 09:17, 26 February 2013 (MST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:53, 17 March 2013
Line 29:		Line 29:
	Note the Main Page -- there should be no red (undefined) links. All pages there now have content! --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 15:11, 17 March 2013 (MDT)		Note the Main Page -- there should be no red (undefined) links. All pages there now have content! --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 15:11, 17 March 2013 (MDT)
	:Great job! I have been following the progress. I apologize for now contributing much the last few days. I've been pretty busy and have had about zero time to do much on here. I'm hoping that will change here in the next few days. In the meantime and until then, I should be able to find a few minutes here and there and do some minor edits. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 18:11, 17 March 2013 (MDT)		:Great job! I have been following the progress. I apologize for now contributing much the last few days. I've been pretty busy and have had about zero time to do much on here. I'm hoping that will change here in the next few days. In the meantime and until then, I should be able to find a few minutes here and there and do some minor edits. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 18:11, 17 March 2013 (MDT)
			::Not a problem. There will be times I don't contribute, either, and I expect to eventually be distracted by something that comes along later. --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 20:53, 17 March 2013 (MDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:08, 26 February 2013
Line 18:		Line 18:
	:I have noticed that it really all depends on which slot they are in in the inventory. I've been using the technique I highlighted on the Main Page Talk on capturing images. It is the quickest and easiest way and I don't have to fire up Photoshop. With the icon images, they have been 75x75 which is fairly small. They eventually get sized down on some of the tables to 25px. On the infoboxes they get resized to 40px. The problem I run into on occasion is when I try to align the image up, sometimes I get the shadow and sometimes I don't. When I don't get the shadow, it is because if I move the image any more to one side, I end up getting dead space or capture part of the slot next to it. The other side will have a huge shadow mark which doesn't look too good. Either way, when they are that small, you don't notice it one bit. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 09:25, 26 February 2013 (MST)		:I have noticed that it really all depends on which slot they are in in the inventory. I've been using the technique I highlighted on the Main Page Talk on capturing images. It is the quickest and easiest way and I don't have to fire up Photoshop. With the icon images, they have been 75x75 which is fairly small. They eventually get sized down on some of the tables to 25px. On the infoboxes they get resized to 40px. The problem I run into on occasion is when I try to align the image up, sometimes I get the shadow and sometimes I don't. When I don't get the shadow, it is because if I move the image any more to one side, I end up getting dead space or capture part of the slot next to it. The other side will have a huge shadow mark which doesn't look too good. Either way, when they are that small, you don't notice it one bit. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 09:25, 26 February 2013 (MST)
	::Mine have been plain old screen captures. That lets me get multiples and a little copy/paste/save produces what I want. It also lets me fiddle with the selection if I miss something. But the icons end up just 40x40, and the blocks are 80x80 or a little less. (Hm, I wonder if I can paint a background wall and place some items against it for contrast...) --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 09:58, 26 February 2013 (MST)		::Mine have been plain old screen captures. That lets me get multiples and a little copy/paste/save produces what I want. It also lets me fiddle with the selection if I miss something. But the icons end up just 40x40, and the blocks are 80x80 or a little less. (Hm, I wonder if I can paint a background wall and place some items against it for contrast...) --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 09:58, 26 February 2013 (MST)
			::: If they are that size, that should be fine. I don't think we will ever go higher than that for the icons or blocks. I think I chose the 75x75 for the icons because when I cropped the very first one, it came out about that size. So it stuck. Of course the 75x75 doesn't quite fit properly and look good with the templates so that is why it gets resized down to 40px. Just remember, you can make the images any size bigger than what we have been using. You can always size down and not lose resolution. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 10:08, 26 February 2013 (MST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:58, 26 February 2013
Line 17:		Line 17:
	I've noticed a lot of your most recent icon images are missing the darker "shadow" on the right and bottom edges. Is this deliberate or were they just not there? --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 09:17, 26 February 2013 (MST)		I've noticed a lot of your most recent icon images are missing the darker "shadow" on the right and bottom edges. Is this deliberate or were they just not there? --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 09:17, 26 February 2013 (MST)
	:I have noticed that it really all depends on which slot they are in in the inventory. I've been using the technique I highlighted on the Main Page Talk on capturing images. It is the quickest and easiest way and I don't have to fire up Photoshop. With the icon images, they have been 75x75 which is fairly small. They eventually get sized down on some of the tables to 25px. On the infoboxes they get resized to 40px. The problem I run into on occasion is when I try to align the image up, sometimes I get the shadow and sometimes I don't. When I don't get the shadow, it is because if I move the image any more to one side, I end up getting dead space or capture part of the slot next to it. The other side will have a huge shadow mark which doesn't look too good. Either way, when they are that small, you don't notice it one bit. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 09:25, 26 February 2013 (MST)		:I have noticed that it really all depends on which slot they are in in the inventory. I've been using the technique I highlighted on the Main Page Talk on capturing images. It is the quickest and easiest way and I don't have to fire up Photoshop. With the icon images, they have been 75x75 which is fairly small. They eventually get sized down on some of the tables to 25px. On the infoboxes they get resized to 40px. The problem I run into on occasion is when I try to align the image up, sometimes I get the shadow and sometimes I don't. When I don't get the shadow, it is because if I move the image any more to one side, I end up getting dead space or capture part of the slot next to it. The other side will have a huge shadow mark which doesn't look too good. Either way, when they are that small, you don't notice it one bit. [[User:Cdrras\|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras\|talk]]) 09:25, 26 February 2013 (MST)
			::Mine have been plain old screen captures. That lets me get multiples and a little copy/paste/save produces what I want. It also lets me fiddle with the selection if I miss something. But the icons end up just 40x40, and the blocks are 80x80 or a little less. (Hm, I wonder if I can paint a background wall and place some items against it for contrast...) --[[User:McClaw\|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw\|talk]]) 09:58, 26 February 2013 (MST)