Anonymous user
User talk:McClaw/Back Wall: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
>McClaw (Replaced content with "So I'm thinking that the "back wall" feature has become complex enough to warrant getting its own page. --~~~~") |
>McClaw No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So I'm thinking that the " | So I'm thinking that the "backwall" feature has become complex enough to warrant getting its own page. The question is if it should be two words ("back wall") or one ("backwall"). --[[User:McClaw|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw|talk]]) 10:16, 24 November 2014 (MST) | ||
:Back wall is two words on the 1.6 release notes. We can always create a redirect, too. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 18:56, 24 November 2014 (MST) | |||
::Two words it will be. And if I tried to stuff all the details I hope to include into the "World" page, it would become unbalanced. --[[User:McClaw|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw|talk]]) 21:03, 24 November 2014 (MST) | |||